Housing: an investment in security, safety, and beauty... I think the old-fashioned values still apply and should remain although some appear to think housing is just a trivial thing ... a waste of money... an unattainable goal... but is it? Actually housing is a very important priority in the lives of people through the ages... a university student is very easily given many tens of thousands of dollars for a degree [in the form of a loan to be repaid with interest] but why isn't home-ownership an equally important goal? People who rent homes are subject to very high rents with nothing to show for their money but they do not apply that same thinking to their education... Why would anyone consider home-ownership a waste of money?
These are some of the questions I ask when I think of how many, many thousands of dollars students pay to attend Mount Allison University with nothing to show at the conclusion of their 'studies'. What do they really learn about real life and self-empowerment? What advice would their comfortable academic mentors give them if they were honest: 'invest in yourself and a home first'? Probably not... the business of academia is a very well fed beast... if only we fed the industries that house people as much gravy as we feed to the academic world... homelessness would end overnight. Abundance is created but if the "Agenda" is scarcity and control it become increasingly difficult to prosper for many.
In reality, well-funded universities are just charities:
Colleges And Universities Are Just Registered Charities (bitchute.com)
Colleges And Universities As Registered Charities (Part II) (bitchute.com)
Josh Goguen, Town Councillor for the Town of Tantramar and returning Town Councillor Allison Butcher are both giving shout-outs to these awful minimized lifestyle dwellings called 'miniature housing' aka Tiny House Cult... at Alice Cotton's "Tantramar Affordable Housing Initiative" on Facebook... I would rather politicians focus less on social engineering of the public into accepting nannystate tiny housing and make themselves more useful and credible by not advocating for any lifestyle or housing option that they themselves are not willing to live in ..... otherwise, I see them as being phoney hypocrites and meddlers.. tiny homes are basically giving up; are you OK with living in a garden shed? Why? "Nannystate" housing is funded housing... if the government can fund these expensive tiny boxes for homes ask why? "Tiny House Planned Communities" remind me of the kibbutz housing model -- very unappealling, very communal.
No comments:
Post a Comment