Shit Erica says online:
Here's my take for the little propagandist who already blocked me last year on her Twitter:
"Sprawl" is a term which is an anti-people offensive and here is why. It prefers "smart"growth which would have people packed in high density as an answer to a problem that does not exist. There is no 'sprawl' in a massive nation such as Canada Erica. There is so much land you could never ever fill it all with people, homes, farms, businesses and ranches.
Here's a little story for your thirsty ears...
In 2013 our family attempted to purchase a family member's home in northern Ontario situated on 160 acres. The property ran along a road and had lots of access and opportunity to be subdivided into perhaps 10 lots of 16 acres each to provide money to us to build a new home and affordable land for those people who were seeking to build their dream homes just minutes from the nearest small town but were told by a grumpy Township 'Reeve' ie. rural Mayor that they didn't want "sprawl".... he himself lived on a large acreage farm not too far away. So we decided not to purchase the property, returned here to life in Sackville New Brunswick. Limiting the use of land by landowners/homeowners is the Agenda of the United Nations.... building homes on land that is a generous sized lot [10 to 16 acres] was heavily frowned upon by "planners" ... why? What did the government want us as landowners to do? Create a subdivision... why? Don't expect to be applauded for promoting "smart"growth when the obvious outcome is such an ugly, horrendous and density-filled "habitat" for people. Oof indeed.
Royal orders from the dead queen ? Why are these land-use restrictions even in place?
Photography by Indie Media Eastcoast.
No comments:
Post a Comment