Got Frank Magazine: Frank Magazine NS (@Frank_Mag_NS) / X
Tips: tips@frankmag.ca, (782) 409-3799 - here: Frank Magazine, Nova Scotia!
Gone Fishin' Back August 4th .. Nova Scotia Frank – Frank Magazine
Showing posts with label frank magazine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label frank magazine. Show all posts
May 9, 2026
Frank Magazine .. Satire From Nova Scotia with Love xo
God bless... a "Frank" mag online freebie for your Saturday morning with coffee..
On X here: Frank Magazine NS (@Frank_Mag_NS) / X
and here: Frank Magazine (@frankmagonline) / X
All in good fun - read here:
Generation Bexte: Conservative MP’s Nazi Grandpa – Frank Magazine
Oct 21, 2024
Mar 20, 2023
Who the Hell is Tim Bousquet Anyway? Frank Magazine Reports...
Tim the journalist is a little too emo on Twitter...
Tim Bousquet (@Tim_Bousquet) / Twitter
At this link:
A day at the beach with Tim Bousquet – Frank Magazine
More Frank Magazine at Twitter...
Satire+ Downeast eh?
Frank Magazine on Twitter: "https://t.co/q3hZjwdZz8" / Twitter
Dec 1, 2022
Frank Magazine Twitter.... The Gift That Keeps On Giving [Online]
Frank reminds us that mockery is still enjoyable...
Slapinski in Butts ballsup - Frank Magazine!
Entertainment Archives - Frank Magazine!
Frank Magazine Ottawa (facebook.com)
Frank mockery of politicians is a long held "satirical" Canadian tradition worth preserving.... and building upon for future generations to come. Oh Canada our home on native peoples' lands.. eh?
Nov 12, 2022
Learning About History with King John III Joseph Gregory Hallett [and some humour from Frank Magazine on Twitter]
Listen and learn.. from the new King of England... Joseph Gregory Hallett, King John III here:
Greg Hallett - Debt Slaves, American Plantation, The Truth beyond the Illusion (2007) - YouTube
Funny memes below from the now defunct Frank Magazine [still posting on Twitter] here:
Frank Magazine (@frankmagonline) / Twitter
What about some real news?
Sep 22, 2022
"Frank Magazine" Goes Tits Up After 30 Years ... Rest in Power & Happy Trails to Mockery Specialist Brother Andrew Douglas, Editor
Managing Editor, Andrew Douglas, and I had a good chin wag a while back on the phone... I like that he was there doing the things he did in Nova Scotia... in a world full of politically correct minions he did stand out... [a kindly way of showing that all politicians are scumbags in the final analysis.]
Honestly... I guess it had to happen... one of the last fun-loving print satire magazines around and its now bit the dust... some final tweets... here..
Frank Magazine (@frankmagonline) / Twitter
fun while it lasted.. thanks for the chuckles.... the one and only... 'Frank Magazine' I'll miss you...
Frank Magazine (@frankmagonline) / Twitter
.jpeg)
Nov 10, 2021
Frank Magazine November 10, 2021 "A Desperate and Tangled Web, Designed to Deceive" by Paul Palango [Reproduced with Permission]
[Republished By Request Of and With The Permission of Paul Palango]
FRANK MAGAZINE NOVEMBER 10, 2021
A DESPERATE AND TANGLED WEB, DESIGNED TO DECEIVE
BY PAUL PALANGO
The clumsy cover up of what really happened with Gabriel Wortman, the RCMP and all those 22 innocent murdered Nova Scotians stumbled into its next stage November 5 when Brad Johns, the Minister of Justice and all things legal, rose in the provincial House of Assembly to insult those killed, their survivors and those in the province and Canada who have been following this unfolding calamity. Johns managed to do this using the sneakiest of political tactics, making an announcement on a Friday, the last day of the Fall session of the House. That way it would be on the record and not covered by the mainstream and alternative media.
What did Johns do?
As reported earlier by Frank – and only Frank – Johns came to praise former Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman for her wonderful work over the previous two years as the head of the RCMP in Nova Scotia. According to Johns, Bergerman “has provided leadership, and been a positive role model for women in a male-dominated world of law enforcement for the last 35 years.” That phrase likely came right out of the Horsemen’s, er, Horsewomen’s mouth. The House unanimously went along with his outrageous motion to acknowledge and praise Bergerman and thank her for her service.
One would think that the families of the survivors would be up in arms about all this and feel betrayed, since a majority of them, we suspect, voted for Tim Houston and helped make the off-shore tax accountant Premier of Nova Scotia. Houston won their vote by attending rallies, looking handsome and telling everyone what they wanted to hear – that he was going to get to the bottom of what happened. NDP leader Gary Burrill, it should be noted, attended the same rallies and said the same things, without the same electoral success. He just announced yesterday his time in the leader's chair is coming to a close.
The Liberals are on board for an obvious reason — they were the ones in charge at the time. But caught up in the legal entanglements that they are in, worn down by the miserable treatment they have received from both government and the RCMP, all the families seem to want at this time is some kind of resolution to the matter. Instead they will have to wait for the pre-programmed Mass Casualty Commission to conduct its show trial and publish its findings and recommendations about two years or more from now, long enough into the future that everyone will have forgotten or care about what happened.
“It pissed us off to hear Tim Houston's Justice minister brag up Bergerman, especially after being present for those marches,” said one person who spoke under the condition of anonymity. “I guess we thought it was a good gesture but at the same time we also knew that he's a politician looking for votes.”
What Houston, Johns and the rest of the elected buffoons seemed unaware of was that Bergerman’s nickname inside the force was “The Blade,” a nod to her skills over the decades at inner-office politics – and that she was hoisted on her own petard.
The House of Assembly shamelessly turned a collective blind eye to what Bergerman did or didn’t do before, during and after the massacres as Gabriel Wortman murdered 13 people in Portapique Beach, had a nap in Debert or somewhere, and then roamed around Nova Scotia for 13.5 hours unhampered by roadblocks, public alerts or police common sense to kill nine more people. His rampage ended only after he apparently ran into a Mountie dog handler named Craig Hubley at the Irving Big Stop in Enfield. Hubley and another unnamed Mountie dispatched Wortman with 20 or so shots, but more on the heroic Hubley in a moment.
The only lasting and unforgettable image of Bergerman is when she appeared on television in the early evening of April 19, 2020 looking red faced, shocked and all-too-eager to run back into the shadows. Bergerman (birthname Leona Marie Bergerman) did everything she could to shrink from public view. Who could forget her performance on that and subsequent days? For seconds at a time she appeared on camera to -- and I'm paraphrasing here -- praise the brave and fearless performances of her selfless troops, descriptives that defy the reality of what actually had happened.
Bergerman repeatedly lamented the death of Constable Heidi Stevenson at the hands of Wortman at the Cloverleaf traffic circle in Shubenacadie, never finding the gumption to explain how Stevenson, a Musical Ride member, school liaison officer and traffic cop, ended up that Sunday morning alone and face-to-face with the murderous Wortman after he had already killed 19 people.
Who could forget Bergerman’s sly but clumsy attempt to insert her own husband, ex-Mountie Mike Butcher, and Chief Superintendent John Robin, the husband of her Halifax colleague, Chief Superintendent Janis Gray, into the middle of the investigation? Butcher and Robin were designated to vet material being sought from the RCMP by the Commission. Caught by Frank Magazine, Butcher’s and Robin’s assignments were quietly cancelled by the RCMP.
As the hearings for the Mass Casualty Commission approached, the RCMP announced that Bergerman was retiring, an event scheduled to take place just before the hearings were to begin in late October. The hearings were subsequently put off until February because commission investigators supposedly found “new evidence.” One can reasonably surmise that they all started reading back issues of Frank or listening to the Nighttime Podcast with Jordan Bonaparte.
On September 28, Bergerman, going by the name Leona Marie Butcher and her husband, Denniss (sic) Michael Butcher, sold their condo overlooking the Halifax Common -- on the fourth floor at 5839 Cunard Street -- for $690,000, $100K over asking. They made a $300,000 profit in five years. Even better, their moving expenses were likely paid by the taxpayers. Good for them. We don’t know where they were headed or what they might be doing.
Will Bergerman be attending the Mass Casualty Commission hearings? I wouldn’t bet on it. The plan is for her to put everything she wants to say on paper in “a foundational document” so that she will not have to undergo the stress and strain of being asked questions in public. Poor woman, we all feel for her.
One question I would ask her is based on something Bergerman told an acquaintance before she packed up her belongings. She didn’t realize that person was someone close to our team, reporting to us about Bergerman’s movements. When asked one day about the Portapique situation, Bergerman dropped a bombshell. If we had a recording of it, it would be the top story in Canada right now. Our friend says Bergerman blurted out that the RCMP suspects that someone in Wortman’s circle may have been an accomplice at one point that weekend. Now Bergerman is in the wind and it appears that the government intends to keep it that way.
Please, Lee, if only for the sake of integrity and perhaps your duty to the citizens of Canada who have paid for your services, come back and tell us everything you know. It would be much appreciated.
Bergerman’s departure is part of a disturbing trend over the past 18 months during which there has been a thinning of the ranks in policing and government as many of those involved in the matter have, for one reason or another, slipped out of Dodge. The first to go were some of the 70 or more Mounties who took almost the entire summer of 2020 off due to the PTSD they suffered from not catching or stopping killer Gabriel Wortman that weekend. Some of those Mounties never returned to work. Others took early retirement.
There are still holes in the 911 system caused by a dearth of operators who have departed because of trauma they suffered while taking calls. In Toronto, police there tell me that at least two Mounties who played prominent roles that weekend had applied for positions there – likely in 23 Division – just east of Pearson International Airport. How many more demoralized rats are fleeing the sinking ship? We just don’t know the true numbers. It’s not something the RCMP likes to advertise considering that it continues to promote itself as the country’s elite police force, a title it surrendered long ago.
Hiding the identities and whereabouts of all those involved before, during and after Portapique has been a goal of the RCMP and governments from the outset. They don’t want the public to know who did what. It’s all part of a pattern of covering up the basic and important facts that are crucial for the public to understand what happened – which is the public’s right.
On the political side, then Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil unexpectedly announced on August 6, 2020 – a mere 109 days after the massacres – that he had accomplished his agenda and was moving on. In his speech that day, McNeil cited myriad positives about his period in leadership. He didn’t say a word about the murders and the fawning, somnolent media didn’t even notice that he hadn’t.
Next to go was Justice Minister and Attorney General Mark Furey. The former Mountie Staff-Sergeant was doing everything he could to protect the Horsemen from public scrutiny, but once the cone of silence cracked and inconvenient facts came tumbling out he, too, decided to call it quits. He chose not to run in the next election.
In New Brunswick, Furey’s counterpart, former RCMP and Fredericton cop Carl Urquhart took the same fork in the road. Urquhart didn’t run for office again. This is notable because the RCMP in New Brunswick played a significant but largely unknown role in the Portapique saga. If you are one of those who actually believe that the New Brunswick Mounties merely attempted to ride to the rescue of their beleaguered Nova Scotia counterparts, I have a couple of bridges in Halifax Harbour that I could sell you for a song.
Also in New Brunswick, Bergerman’s counterpart, Assistant Commissioner Larry Tremblay was quietly axed by the provincial government in July. The stated reason was that the government had “lost confidence” in Tremblay’s leadership. Police sources have long pointed to Tremblay as being the eminence grise in RCMP anti-biker operations in the Maritimes. He controlled everything the Mounties and others were doing or trying to do. Meanwhile, as I told you the other week, he was a bit of a shopaholic at GC Surplus, hoovering up deals on used and surplus government supplies at the same time Wortman was doing the same thing (Frank 857). Sources close to the matter say Tremblay's departure is directly connected to the massacres.
“The word is that this is all about what happened in Portapique,” an ex-police officer said. “The heat is rising to the top and everyone is ducking.”
All of which brings us back to Premier Houston. One would think that based upon what he said at the public marches that he would live up to his word and be eager to right the ship of state and seek justice for the 22 people who were murdered and their grieving families. That now appears to have been, oh no, mere politics.
When the time came Houston named the feckless, nonlawyer, ardent Masonic Temple devotee Brad Johns as both Attorney General and Justice Minister. In that capacity he was placed in charge of both the police and the bureaucracy that supposedly polices the police.
It feels like a plot twist in a Dan Brown potboiler, doesn't it? (A dupe is enlisted to protect powerful members of a secretive society from scrutiny following a mass murder. The Bluenose Code: Available now in paperback!-ed.)
Here were Nova Scotia politicians saying kind words about the leader of the police force that clearly could be held legally culpable for the deaths of nine or more innocent Nova Scotians, depending upon what is revealed in future evidence.
Meanwhile, the provincial government next door in New Brunswick removed its RCMP leader in a bold, unprecedented and curious move.
Reading between the lines, were the Nova Scotia pols just trying to console poor Lee Bergerman for being a tragic victim of inter-office abuse by her New Brunswick counterparts?
We do also have to keep in mind we are talking about Brad Johns here, a fellow who likely cannot believe he has risen to this station in life, probably all too happy to do a bit of forelock-tugging for his police masters.
As we document the steps in this ongoing coverup, it should be noted that since April 19, 2020, the names of a few RCMP members were revealed in court documents. The RCMP and governments have not even publicly confirmed the names of any of them. Even Constable Craig Hubley, the heroic dog handler who allegedly identified and shot Wortman, was only identified after his name was “accidentally” revealed in court documents.
The Halifax Chronicle Herald’s Chris Lambie wrote a hagiographic piece on Hubley based upon information from “a confidential source.”
It all smelled to me. Something wasn’t right. Eventually, I got a tip of my own about Hubley, and I immediately understood why he was the kind of Mountie who could be trusted to keep his lips zipped.
Hubley’s father, Corporal Carl Hubley, had been a respected, long-time member of the force.
Craig Hubley’s long-time and beloved step mother was Deborah K. Smith.
Who’s she? Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.
It all feels like a desperate and tangled web, designed to deceive.
paulpalango@protonmail.com
--
Andrew Douglas Frank Magazine phone: (902) 420-1668 fax: (902) 423-0281 cell: (902) 221-0386 andrew@frankmagazine.ca www.frankmagazine.ca ... https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/
Recent podcast with Jordan Bonapart at Nighttime Podcast on November 7th, 2021:
Nova Scotia Rampage - Open Lines and Updates - with Paul Palango - YouTube
Paul Palango - Father of 4 daughters, Glass Artist, Author, Journalist, Avid Vaxx Promoter, and Maritimer.... Home - Kiln Art [ website for glass art creations with his wiferoo ]
@@@@@
Will Paul Palango be reporting on the claim of Kingship by Joseph Gregory Hallett, King John III story this year or continue to ignore it? Maybe in 2022? We'll see... in the meantime I have a question mark over Palango's head...
Sep 10, 2021
Paul Palango's Frank Magazine Article September 10th, 2021 Re-Shared With Permission
FRANK MAGAZINE SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
YES, BUT WILL IT BE TRAUMA-INFORMED?
By PAUL PALANGO
In the movies press conferences look exciting and meaningful. Reporters competing with each other shouting out questions. Tense confrontations. Sweat on brows. Pinned down by the unrelenting barrage, someone inevitably cracks and blurts out the truth. Headlines are created and everyone retires afterward to a bar for a celebratory round or six. That’s how it goes in the movies.
In the real world, it never goes that way. There is little or no room for error. Everything is scripted. The questions are predictable, and the answers worked out in advance. No surprises. The illusion of facts. Just enough to sculpt a meaningless headline in one publication or another.
Nowadays, there is something worse than a traditional press conference. We had one the other day in Nova Scotia. The occasion was a “virtual progress update” from the three commissioners at the head of the federal-provincial Mass Casualty Commission.
Virtual was an appropriate way to describe what happened. The Cambridge Dictionary meaning describes the adjective this way: “Almost, but not exactly or in every way.”
I attended from my home office on the South Shore. I phoned in and registered. I was the second reporter to do so, after a fellow from Radio-Canada.
My qualifications as an attendee were unique. Over the past 17 months, I have written far more than anyone else about the subject at hand – the murder of 22 innocent people by denturist Gabriel Wortman over a 13.5-hour period on April 18 and 19, 2020. Alone and in collaboration with others, like Stephen Maher of MacLean’s, Andrew Douglas of Frank Magazine and Jordan Bonaparte of the Nighttime Podcast and a host of citizen investigators, we have broken many important stories about what actually happened, most importantly the epic failure in policing by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Together we have publicly documented and detailed the many lies and deceptions of the police and their enablers in governments and the justice system. I am writing a doorstop of a book for Random House about it all. There’s also a large documentary project to put it all on film. I promise it will not be your typical Canadian yawner which is so mind-bogglingly balanced and politically correct that it is all but impossible to figure out what really happened.
Meanwhile, mainstream reporters covering the Nova Scotia massacres have largely lost the thread. With the occasional exception of the CBC’s Elizabeth McMillan, they’ve all moved on to other glittery sagas, waiting for the MCC, as they call it, to hold hearings and spoon feed them more headlines.
Former Nova Scotia Chief Justice Michael MacDonald, chairman of the Commission, spoke first this day. He touched the usual notes about affected families, beautiful communities and resilient people – the Nova Scotia Strong meme – being an example. He talked about witnesses and evidence gathering and about how the commission was “completely independent.” He said that the commission built its team by selecting the best people for the job, failing to note that many of the investigators, including lead investigator Barbara McLean had worked with federal Solicitor General Bill Blair, the boss of this thing, when he was Toronto Police Chief.
Some would argue that’s far from independent. There appears to be a guiding hand in Ottawa.
MacDonald, speaking in a flat almost lifeless tone of voice, said the commission had a two-year mandate and was going to conduct its own investigation to create “an evidence-based record” and “foundational documents.” He tossed around words like “consultative” and “collaborative.”
“We continue to subpoena documents and interview witnesses to ensure that we are able to get to the bottom of what happened and why,” the former judge said. “We are committed to doing our work transparently and respectfully. We are also approaching our work in a trauma-informed manner. We will do our utmost to make sure that we will not cause more harm to those who have already suffered …. We must balance two competing but important considerations. Honoring the public’s right to understand what happened while protecting the privacy and dignity of those who have already suffered so much.”
Almost from the moment Gabriel Wortman was shot at the Irving Big Stop in Enfield, government officials and the RCMP have been promoting the notion that they were all determined to protect the survivors of the dead from further trauma. That’s become their collective mantra. They seem to have forgotten that the real victims are the 22 dead and that our society demands answers in their name. That’s how the justice system is supposed to work, as difficult as that might be for some of the families to accept.
“I would like to stress that our commission is not a court. Our approach is very different from a civil trial or a criminal prosecution, which are adversarial. We cannot and will not make findings of civil or criminal liability or assign punishment,” he said.
Somebody else could always come along after the fact, pick up the Commission’s evidence and run with it, but who? The RCMP won’t be interested, of that we can be sure.
“However, difficult precedents and uncomfortable truths will be explored,” MacDonald continued, “to get to the bottom of what happened and why.”
Cynics are welcome to believe that when they see it.
Next up was Commissioner Leanne Fitch, the former police chief of Fredericton for seven years, daughter of a long-time Mountie, wife of a Fredericton cop, and a former management adviser for the RCMP.
Yep, independent, that one.
She was followed by Ontario lawyer Dr. Kim Stanton who is an expert on aboriginal affairs and who believes that public inquiries should essentially be social engineering mechanisms. Social engineering? The implementation of seat belts was a good example. Then there were the failures. The federal government promoted margarine over butter and carbohydrates over meat. People got bigger, fatter and had more heart attacks. They don’t like talking about that.
This being a “virtual progress update” the Commissioners didn’t take questions.
That was left up to Emily Hill, the Commission’s Council and MCC lead investigator Barbara McLean.
The first question is from the CBC’s Brett Ruskin. They threw him a headline, stating that the commission had issued almost 50 subpoenas for information.
Ruskin was followed by Michael MacDonald of The Canadian Press (no relation, that we know of, to the retired judge). Alexa MacLean from Global Newspopped the next forgettable question and follow up. Perhaps the highlight was Marie Adsett from CTV Atlantic who got so emotional about the commission having not created a safe place for the victims’ families “so that it doesn’t feel like a court room,” one easily could have mistaken her for a victim.
Finally, my turn, came. When my name was called, I could’ve sworn Emily Hill appeared to roll her eyes. But maybe I’m being overly sensitive.
My journalistic strategy over the past 17 months has been to put names, facts and viable theories on the public record so that they could not be easily ignored by either the Commission or the media. That’s what I did this time.
“Can you assure the people of Nova Scotia and Canada that the RCMP has acted in a transparent fashion and fully co-operated with the commission. For example, has it been given full access to or control of all communication records between RCMP members in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick on April 18 and 19, 2020. This includes both analog and encrypted radio channels reserved for supervisors, ERT members and regular members as well cell phone records and any other means of communication between the various parties such as digital texts or paper records for the hours leading up to and including the massacres. If so, will the commission be releasing all of these audio records to the public? If not, why not?”
MacLean and Hill ragged the puck with their answer.
I followed with this one.
“Video tapes published in June by Frank magazine highlighted obvious and serious discrepancies in the official report from the Serious Incident Response Team in the shooting of Gabriel Wortman on April 19th at the Irving Big Stop in Enfield. Will the Commission be calling upon SIRT director Felix Cacchione to explain the methodology he and his team used to conduct their investigation? Further, will the commission be issuing subpoenas to any and all RCMP members or others who were involved in the hunt for and shooting of Gabriel Wortman?”
They didn’t have much to say about that one, either.
The point is this. The Commission has wrapped itself in a flag of convenience – victimhood. The members say they care. They are “trauma informed.” They are “respectful.”
That’s not the issue. It’s merely a smokescreen.
The families were already traumatized. They, most Nova Scotians and other Canadians want answers to the obvious questions and don’t want the inquiry drowning in tears and sentimental dross.
Here are some questions they can “independently” consider or which the mainstream media might screw up its collective courage to ask at the next “virtual” press conference:
1) What was Gabriel Wortman’s relationship with the RCMP? Was he the target of an ongoing investigation or an informant working for the RCMP in Nova Scotia or, importantly, New Brunswick?
2) What was the RCMP really doing that night in Portapique?
3) The RCMP has never disclosed who was in charge that weekend. There had to be someone with a white shirt giving orders. Who was it?
4) Victim Jamie Blair told the RCMP via 911 that Wortman was dressed as a Mountie before she was killed. Why did the RCMP lie about when it first knew Wortman was dressed as a Mountie and driving what appeared to be an RCMP cruiser?
5) Why is there not an independent police investigation into the shooting of Corrie Ellison? The RCMP has admitted that its officers were very near where he died on Orchard Beach Drive at the time he was killed, but they didn’t see Wortman or Ellison’s brother who was walking up the road at that time.
6) Why did the RCMP not call for help from other police forces?
7) Why did the Serious Incident Response Team led by former Judge Felix Cacchione issue reports that play fast and loose with the facts?
8) More importantly, why did Cacchione’s office not investigate the entirety of the RCMP’s performance that weekend? After all, there is a strong argument that the RCMP could be guilty of criminal negligence causing multiple deaths including that of one of their own, Constable Heidi Stevenson. Why was there not a criminal investigation mounted by an outside police force?
9) How much damage has this ongoing charade done to the integrity of the justice system?
Having asked such impolite and uncomfortable questions and shown no respect for the powers that be, I guess, is the reason why Ms. Hill seemed to roll her eyes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)